Amazing Spider - Man 2 feels like four or five motion picture jammed together . The good news program is , two of those movies are really , really good . The bad news is , the bloat and extra subplots get in the manner of the storytelling , and palpate like predecessor of overstuff superhero movies to come . Minor spoilers beforehand …
And by “ minor , ” I mean “ vague generalizations , plus secret plan element that are full revealed in the trailers . ”
Amazing Spider - Man is the continuation to 2012 ’s sturdy reboot , which rested on the chemical science between Peter Parker ( Andrew Garfield ) and Gwen Stacy ( Emma Stone ) , plus an assortment of well - cast father figures . The sequel still gets a lot of mileage out of the chemistry between Peter and Gwen , but it ’s also the most continuation - y subsequence in the history of sequel .
Part of the appealingness of the first ASM was its flimsy “ indie moving picture ” feel thanks to ( 500 ) Clarence Shepard Day Jr. of Summer director Marc Webb . There were a fairish number of intimate scenes involving Peter , Gwen and the citizenry in their lives . That , plus the emphasis on Peter see to be a real hero , deliver barren people and earn the trust of New Yorkers , helped Amazing Spider - Man to overcome some notable flaw .
The good persona of ASM2 still have some of that “ indie movie ” tone , as Peter and Gwen work out out their relationship in the aftermath of Peter ’s hope to Gwen ’s father to entrust Gwen alone . Whenever Garfield is in a fit with Stone , or with Sally Field ( Aunt May ) , the drama feels substantial and personal .
A lot of the rest of the film , though , palpate festinate and fake — a deadly combination for this sort of movie . In particular , there are a million subplots . Every metre you begin following one of the movie ’s innumerable storylines , it switch over over to another . At time , the movie reduce back and forth between two subplots in progress . It ’s not that they ’re confusing or hard to abide by , but it ’s tough to care , and some of them are sorely underdeveloped and seem set up - on .
Textbook example of crap villainy
This movie has a lot of track to lay on inclose two new major villains , the Green Goblin and Electro , but also laying the cornerstone for multiple sequels , because Sonywants to put out a Spider - Man movie every year .
There are a few trouble with this : First , neither of the celluloid ’s baddie are compelling enough to rationalize the amount of time we pass with them . The motion picture apparently wants to flesh them out , but in fact both Goblin and Electro remain one - dimensional cardboard characters , for the most part . Dane De Haan ( Chronicle ) does a valiant line to bring a sulphurous wryness to Harry Osborn , but is stuck with a mostly one - note character . And Jamie Foxx , as Electro , seems to be in a very different movie than everybody else — he ’s a camp caricature of a pathetic loser who haunt about Spider - Man until he gets superpowers .
In fact , Electro ( and to a lesser extent Green Goblin ) feel like throwbacks to 1990s superhero movies . Foxx ’s operation does n’t experience that unlike than , say , Jim Carrey in Batman Forever . Neither of them feel like the kind of villain we ’ve come to carry in the backwash of Heath Ledger ’s Joker , Tom Hiddleston ’s Loki , or even Frank Grillo ’s Crossbones .
second , the problem of step on it subplots is especially acute with some of the villain setup — there are a net ton of scenes , particularly setting up Harry Osborn ’s character , that find like shorthand . The direct contrast between the Peter - Gwen fit , which feel like the way people actually mouth to each other in existent life , and almost any scene involving the villain , in which the dialogue and playing are stylize and expedient , is specially telling . Garfield is good enough that he lift the villains ’ biz on any prospect they share — but it ’s not enough .
And last , the villains do n’t have anything interesting to do in this film . Given how much of its running clock time they occupy , they ought to have something more going on . In fact , if you diagram the villains ’ progression in this film , it close mirrors the manner Sandman and Venom were used in the much - maligned Spider - Man 3 .
The Lizard was also kind of a crap villain in the first movie , but I at least liked his second of being a mentor to Peter and Gwen , and his final scheme was sort of amusingly unearthly .
The weakest subplot in the photographic film is the one in which Peter searches for the truth about his father ( both his parents went miss at the same meter , but this is Hollywood , so we get daddy event . ) This subplot has a few potential pit , chief among them the danger of degrade Peter ’s heroism by crowd the focal point onto how he got his power , as counterbalance to what he choose to do with them . But mostly , it ’s boring , and serves as an exculpation for crummy “ buried enigma ” figure .
The Italian sandwich and his city
It ’s too bad Spidey is weighed down with so much excess luggage this time around , because the moving-picture show at the center of all this fix is pretty solid . Not just the Peter - and - Gwen stuff , but also all the stuff that worked in the first film , about gallantry and the urban center .
Once again , New York is a full - vaned type in the film , and some of the well moments require ordinary New Yorkers interacting with the friendly neighborhood Spider - Man . Marc Webb really gets what makes Spider - Man work as a case , more than Sam Raimi ever did .
And Webb goes even further towards showing the skyline and the heights of the huge buildings . Spider - Man ’s swinging from the building tops is still one of the most thrilling effects in film — see this in IMAX if you may — and a lot of the best visuals in the movie take swoop from swell heights , or standing on top of a tall respite bridge .
At the same metre , the emphasis on muted subplots and villain origins drags the film down , both metaphorically and literally — you ca n’t help but notice that the city feels smaller , squatter and less heroic , any metre Webb is forced to use a quite a little of greenscreen and CG . The angles get lower , the shots stuck at ground - degree . At just the moment when the picture ought to be opening out and take larger than sprightliness , the canvass paradoxically seems to shrink .
Christopher Nolan thought very consciously about the vantage full point of each of his three Batman films — the first was in the cover of the skyscrapers , the second at flat coat degree , and the third subterranean . Here , the disconnection between advantage points in the film feels both inadvertent and diagnostic of the larger trouble of muddle . ( And Nolan , too , had a style for make an overstuffed cinema find like ambition and a broad canvas , rather than just studio apartment - mandated toy advertising . )
Final thought : Amazing Spider - Man 2 is mostly enjoyable enough , in nastiness of a reasonably underwhelming final act that feels like the logical result of the rushed storytelling in the first place in the movie . But this movie ’s weaknesses feel like a taste perception of the “ megafranchise ” era to come — when you sacrifice canonic storytelling in the name of cramming in as many character and hints for future task as potential , your film inevitably suffers .
Or to put it another elbow room — when it total to storytelling , with outstanding irresponsibility come a deficiency of great power .
Emma StoneMarc WebbMoviesSpider - ManSuperheroes
Daily Newsletter
Get the best technical school , science , and culture news in your inbox daily .
News from the future , save to your present tense .
You May Also Like
