What do racoon , so-and-so , and crows all have in common ? They are all highly intelligent creatures . They are also some of the city ’s biggest mischief - makers . And that might be no coincidence .

A new report publish in the journalAnimal Behaviorexamined whether or not inventiveness and behavioural tractableness help oneself species cohabit with people in dense urban sprawl – and whether these traits put them in more conflict with humanity , paradoxically   threatening their survival as they are increasingly come to be see as pain in the neck or , even , pest .

The short response : apparently , yes .

Even more startlingly , city occupier may unwittingly be involved in some sort of " arms race " with their four - footed and avian neighbors as they become more and more adept at urban living and watch how to overcome animal deterrents .

" Animals that innovate fresh ways to lick problems in their surroundings could repel a type of arms raceway with humans , where animals and humans cultivate continuously to outsmart one another , " co - author Lauren Stanton , a PhD   educatee at the University of Wyoming ’s Animal Behavior and Cognition Lab , said in astatement .

Where we have invented " creature - proof " tripe bins , raccoons and kea have learned how toopen said trash bins . And where we have invent electric fences , elephant have find out how todisable them . Elsewhere , monkeys are mastering the art ofpickpocketing , shop aredump - diving , and birds arestealing foodstraight out of   our hands .

For the study , the team at Wyoming University looked at different types of cognitive abilities ( cerebrate : learnedness , memory , behavioral flexibility , and problem - solving ) and comparing them to antisocial demeanor ( remember :   kill livestock , damaging property , transmitting disease , slip food , and hurting human being ) .

They then consider various personality types and how they regard an animate being ’s willingness to approach urban environments . A curious and bold   inclination , for example , might make an animal more risk - inclined and , therefore , more likely to come near man or human prop .

Take one winged city dweller : the crow . Their impressive memory allows them to   prognosticate when and where to find food , for example by con a trash collection timetable . Their boldness might remind them to go out and seek solid food in busy region . And their littering , gathering , andcard - stealing behaviormight put them in battle with man . ( Alternatively , their smartness could be put to good use , as one Dutch ship’s company hopes . )

In contrast ,   less   daring animals like the prairie wolf may minimise interaction with humans and try out food at nighttime . This seems to be a vulgar tactic with late inquiry suggestingmore and more animate being are becoming nocturnalin their habits – and humanity are to blame .

" give increasing human population and expansion into animal habitat , there is a great likelihood for human - wildlife dispute , " Benson - Amramadded .

" Our work illustrates the need for enquiry on a great number of cognitive abilities in divers coinage to understand how we can well mitigate these battle . "

In the meantime , check out out this cheeky monkey stealing a pair of specs .